UFO: What was reported at the conference of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

UFO: What was reported at the conference of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
UFO: What was reported at the conference of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

On August 6, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) held a meeting on UFO-related safety as part of its annual conference. The six-member team included three scientists, including one from NASA, the European Space Agency (ESA) project director, the director of science at the National Aeronautical Anomaly Reporting Center (NARCAP), and one former US Navy pilot.

All panellists presented a wide range of UFO / UAP-related topics, starting with the history of UFO / UAP scientists, the possible physics behind such phenomena as the infamous Tik-Tock incident of the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier group in 2004, and ending with a growing number of UFO sightings reported by both military and civilian pilots.

Over the course of the nearly five hour session, many recurring themes emerged, so here are the top 5 takeaways from this conference:


Few aspects of the meeting stood out more than the fact that the six speakers and nearly 100 participating engineers who watched the meeting live took the topic with a serious, scientific approach. The presenter set this tone at the very beginning with his statements about professional behavior, but this warning turned out to be more or less unnecessary, since during the lengthy discussion there were no jokes and the problems were discussed seriously and professionally.

Certainly not without "one black sheep". At one point, a particularly "seasoned" participant who had a very distracting slideshow of airships and chemical formulas (among other random images) streaking across a virtual wall behind him jumped up to exclaim with glee that the whole topic really is a mystery, and that the only thing we know for sure is that "these are not little green men who flew here in spaceships flying faster than light!" His comment was met with complete silence and more than a few frowns. After that, the "aggressive skeptic" fell silent and did not enter into the discussion again.

Instead, there was a dry, shockingly mundane series of presentations on aviation security, with none of the presenters or listeners (except one, because there is always one) attempting to ridicule or downplay the reality of the UFO security problem faced by commercial and military pilots all over the world..

“I think the biggest outcome of this conference is recognition,” said former US Navy pilot Ryan Graves, who has repeatedly highlighted the real issue of mid-air collisions with UFOs that his former fellow pilots face every day. straight from the DNI report that "some UFOs" are real objects."


At one point or another, each speaker has mentioned the existence of public opinion, which prevents respected scientists from studying this topic. Many noted that this question alone had missed more than half a century of study opportunities.

"There has been an open discussion among scientists about the nature of UFOs," said NASA's Ravi Copparapu, pointing in particular to the UFO / UAP analysis conducted by atmospheric scientist James MacDonald of the University of Arizona back in the 1950s. "And it was not stigmatized.This is reality and science must study it, especially in our time."

At least one of the participants wrote in the chat that the very existence of this session is indisputable evidence of a decrease in the degree of negative attitude towards the UFO topic.

Likewise, many other panellists and visitors pointed to the work of astrobiologists and astronomers at NASA and ESA who plan to use space-based observational platforms of the future, including NASA's James Webb Space Telescope, which is scheduled to launch in November this year, to search for biosignatures and technosignatures - signs of extraterrestrial life.

While such discussions took place mainly during informal questions and answers, such frank and open comments about the changing attitudes of scientists towards the possibility of extraterrestrial life at least hint that the majority of those present are generally open to all possible sources of origin. UFOs, but they remain more concerned about the fundamental issue of human safety in our skies.


Since the release of the DoDs UAPTF report, the call for better data is more urgent than ever. Or, as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's super detective Sherlock Holmes once said, "Data! Data! Data! I can't make bricks without clay!"

This thesis and sentiment was repeatedly emphasized throughout the AIAA UFO / UAP Safety Session, where every scientist and speaker practically begged for more data for analysis.

It should be noted that such "requests for video and photos" are perplexing, since over the decades since the beginning of the UFO fixation on video, a huge amount of material has been accumulated, and it can be understood that these scientists who denied the existence of UFOs for decades may not know about them. but if they have a desire - the materials will not be difficult to find - "glory to the great Internet."


Perhaps the most enjoyable aspect of the entire session was the parts that were the most difficult to understand. This is because more often than not, when you bring together a group of smart and highly educated people and ask them to take a serious look at such an important issue as aviation security, they tend to do just that.

For example, some lengthy and complex calculations by the UFO Science Coalition presented by electrical engineer Peter Reali have shown the incredible amount of energy required to propel an object like the alleged Tik-Tak UFO (as well as numerous other geometric shapes), from 28,000 feet to just 50 feet in less than a second. This analysis also highlighted the devastating impact of such rapid acceleration and deceleration on the environment, with the facility dumping all of its energy to come to a complete stop.

"The design capacity of all objects in 7-8 seconds is equivalent to 1.05 kilotons of TNT, or tactical nuclear weapons," Reali said. Oddly, he noted, no such effect was observed in 2004.

This question, which was raised more than once during other presentations, often led to deep mathematical discussions, usually ending with each of the scientists and engineers in the discussion (or in a third-party chat) admitting that they were not able to explain the movement of UFOs without speaking already about the apparent absence of its impact on the environment while dumping a huge amount of energy necessary to descend and stop at such an incredible speed.

Again, in fairness, it should be noted that none of the participants in the discussion questioned either the existence of the facility, or the testimony of the pilots and radar operators, which may indicate non-bias.Assuming the readings and videos were accurate, they discussed a number of possible explanations based on modern science. In the end, everyone seemed to agree that no suitable explanation has yet been found.

"It's a shame that 60 years ago we knew so much and still haven't gotten around to exploring these things as a scientific community," Knut lamented during one such discussion of past cases, when scientists in the 1950s reported many of the same the supposed characteristics and form factors that are currently observed in UFOs. "This is 60 years of lost research."

It is strange to hear these regrets … I would like to ask scientists - who prevented you from doing this? "Public opinion?", "Pressure of power structures?", "Fear of losing reputation and positions?" You were waiting for a "go-ahead" - permission from the "higher authorities". It's good that this permission came in the form of recognition of the UFO phenomenon by the Pentagon, otherwise you would continue to close your eyes to the fact of their existence.


For most of those who have had the opportunity to see the interview with Ryan Graves, there is little doubt that he is a prepared, level-headed person, whether he is at the controls of a fighter jet or in a classroom] full of scientists and engineers. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the group chose Graves to perform after individual presentations, as his testimony was undoubtedly the most exciting.

"For me, the question of whether UFOs are real is a stupid conversation, because I know for sure that this is all really happening," Graves said during the discussion.

Later, Graves continued his call by telling panelists and online visitors, "You are still pilots and this is a safety concern. Our pilots see this every flight. And this is all very realistic, you know? This is the day-to-day safety impact of unknown objects. ".

Graves' measured tone was once again revealed during a particularly heated exchange of views between scientists about the impossibility of getting their hands on classified information about UFOs.

"The fact that we are talking about access to data," Graves said, "is still a concern at a time when our pilots have UFO encounters on a daily basis. The information should at least be open to specialists and scientists."


We talked a lot. Everyone agrees that UFOs are real. Everyone agrees that UFOs show technologies beyond the reach of humanity. Everyone wants to know more - scientists ask "give a video!" UFO, continue - give the accumulated files, videos, documents, radar data, etc., give the invoice for the beginning of scientific study.

The main thing in this meeting is that it took place. The fact that it was attended by scientists from government agencies, active pilots and specialists of various fields of activity, including design engineers. Even last year, could you imagine that such a thing is possible at all? Of course not, but after the United States openly announced a change in its approach to the UFO theme, the years have started, and this is the most important thing.

Popular by topic